Wednesday, February 8, 2017

Is It Just Another Day?

Is It Just Another day?
By Nick Ashton, CEO/CTO, CommSmart Global Group

How soon we forget!  To some, every day was a day of importance, reflection, and significance.  Others, just a day off or another day in their paradise.  

What is today to you?

The problems of the world are still vibrating, closer to home, emails to answer, phone calls to return and turmoil just around the corner.  

It is all about survival of the fittest.  The trouble is, all of us who care are fighting for the same outcome, which is to continue in business, enjoy our social status and pay the bills.  

Others, yes others, could not care less about today, tomorrow or who they slander, liable, hurt, rob or leave for dead.  This includes national and local government leaders and their minions, no, not those minions!

Dealing with a public that has been taught to be reliant on public services and entitlements is not a walk in the park.  The Brass, management or the government expect you to do more, with less.  

The public just expects you to always be there!

So who is going to take charge and stem the bloodletting in the reduction of the opportunity to provide needed promised services?  

Law enforcement, Fire, EMS and Emergency Services, you are under a pressure that degrades your ethics and works environment.  How you deal with your co-workers, bosses and face the public with their ever-mounting demands.  

Sadly you know for a fact that you cannot deliver what is required under these circumstances and it will only get worse.

What positive actions can we do to change these real concerns and get back to what the job was all about when you started?

It is not just another day?  Is it?

Collectively we can make that difference…





WE are in the NOW and
KEEP YOU; in the KNOW…

Worldwide Call: +1 (330) 366.6860



Copyright 2017

Tuesday, February 7, 2017

You Don't Have To Kill Someone, To Take Their Life

You Don't Have To Kill Someone, To Take Their Life
By Nicholas Ashton, CEO/CIO, CommSmart Global Group

Death is the ultimate finality and guaranteed to us all.

There are those that inflict so much on other people, death would be a far better outcome.

Female Genital Mutilation has been part of other’s culture and ideology for centuries.

Female genital mutilation (FGM), also known as female genital cutting and female circumcision, is the ritual removal of some or all of the external female genitalia. The practice is found in Africa, Asia and the Middle East, and within communities from countries in which FGM is common and part of their life.


The number of women and girls at risk for female genital mutilation (FGM) in the United States has more than doubled in the past 10 years, according to new figures released.

Newsweek has reported:
The data, the first on FGM in the U.S. for a decade, is being published to coincide with the United Nations’ International Day of Zero Tolerance for FGM.
More than half a million women and girls in the U.S. are at risk of undergoing FGM in the U.S. or abroad or have already undergone the procedure, including 166,173 under the age of 18, according to the Population Reference Bureau (PRB). Immigration to the U.S. from African and Middle Eastern countries—where the practice of FGM is a deeply entrenched cultural tradition—is the sole factor for the rise in numbers, says Mark Mather, a demographer at PRB who led the data analysis. There has not been an increase in the practice happening in the U.S. itself, he says.

According to the PRB, California is the state with the largest number of at-risk women and girls, with 56,872, followed by New York, with 48,418, and Minnesota, with 44,293. In terms of cities in the U.S., New York, Washington, and Minneapolis-St. Paul is the metropolitan areas with the largest numbers of at-risk women and girls. Hawaii is the only state with zero women and girls at risk, according to the data. However, Mather points that while there may be some at risk in the state, the number is so small that it didn’t show up in the sample data.

Included in the data are girls at risk of being sent back to their family’s origin country to undergo FGM—a practice widely known as “vacation cutting”—or having a traditional midwife or cutter sent to perform FGM in the U.S.  

Globally, around 130 million women and girls are living with the effects of FGM and around 3 million undergo the procedure annually, according to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). The practice, known to be performed in 29 countries and usually at the hands of midwives or physicians, involves cutting the external female genitalia for non-medical reasons. Depending on local customs, it could also include additional modifications ranging from cutting away part of the clitoris to removing the inner and outer vaginal lips before sewing the remaining skin together, leaving a small hole for urination and menstrual blood.

The practice predates religion and has no religious significance in either Islam nor Christianity. However, communities of both faiths continue to circumcise their daughters, believing it will cleanse or purify the girl, ensure she remains sexually chaste, prevent cheating on her future husband and keep her behaving well.

In the past year, FGM has come under greater scrutiny in the international community. In Egypt, where female circumcision is illegal, a doctor named Raslan Fadl was sentenced to two years in prison for manslaughter in January for performing an FGM operation that killed 13-year-old Sohair al-Batea in 2013. This was the country’s first FGM conviction. The U.K. also had its first-ever FGM trial this year, but Dr. Dhanuson Dharmasena, who was accused of illegally performing FGM on a woman in London days after she gave birth, was acquitted on Wednesday.

Immigration to Western countries where FGM is not traditionally practiced means health care providers have had to adapt to the harmful medical consequences of FGM. Greater awareness, along with better data—last month, Heartlands Hospital in Birmingham, U.K., reported treating 1,500 cases of FGM in the past five years—has led to acknowledgement of the specialized health care needs of women have had FGM, like psychological trauma and greater attention during childbirth due to pain, possible genital tears and the danger posed to the unborn child.

The case of Dharmasena only came about because the midwife noticed what he was doing—restitching the patient after she had given birth—and warned him it could be constituted as FGM.

FGM has been illegal in the U.S. since 1996, but an amendment to the law banning vacation cutting wasn’t passed until 2012. In 2006, Khalid Adem, an Ethiopian immigrant, was the first person convicted of performing FGM in the U.S. after prosecutors alleged he cut his daughter’s clitoris with a pair of scissors.

On Thursday Rep. Joe Crowley, D-New York, and Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, introduced new legislation, supported by international human rights group Equality Now, that aims to create a national strategy to protect girls in the U.S. from FGM. Crowley, who has a 14-year-old daughter, passed a law in 2012 that helped close a loophole that allowed parents to take their children abroad for vacation cutting. He says the new bill will take further action, like establishing a hotline for at-risk girls and better education for teachers and health care workers. FGM is a sensitive subject, he says, but one that needs to be talked about, especially because it robs girls of a chance of a normal life.

“I want my daughter to experience fulfilled life at its whole. I want it not only for my daughter but for all girls to have that opportunity,” says Crowley. “For millions of girls, that’s been taken away from them, often by their own family.” 

The introduction of the law was timed to coincide with the U.N.’s Zero Tolerance Day, held annually to celebrate the progress that’s been made toward FGM elimination—like the passing of legislation banning it in countries like Kenya, Guinea-Bissau and Uganda—but also recognize what still needs to be done.

“It’s an important moment for everybody to reflect on the harms of this practice, on the commitments that have been done at the international level,” says Nafissatou Diop, the coordinator of the UNFPA-UNICEF joint program on FGM. “We have girls fighting for their rights, we have communities, religious leaders, women, men, who are saying no to the practice of FGM.”

The focus of this year’s Zero Tolerance Day is the medicalization of FGM, which is on the rise in several countries. Around 20 percent of those who undergo FGM will endure it at the hands of a medical practitioner, says Diop. While many parents know it’s harmful, they think there’s a reduced risk if their daughters are cut by a health professional who is trained in saving lives and knows how to stop bleeding.

According to Diop, many health providers are pressured into providing FGM services by their communities. But, she adds, FGM performed by a doctor “is not safer. FGM cannot be safe.”

In some parts of the world, medicalized FGM is even more common. For example, in Egypt, around 77 percent of girls who undergo FGM are cut by health personnel. Prevalence there is so widespread that in many rural areas and villages, doctors, for whom FGM is a source of income, earning them between 100 and 200 Egyptian pounds per case, have never seen an uncut woman.

Medical schools in the country—where cutting off part of the clitoris is the main form of FGM—do not cover it in any curriculum, but groups like UNFPA and the Egyptian Ministry of Health are training doctors on what to do when a family brings them a girl and ask for her to be circumcised.

"The challenge is that you need to work on many levels. You need to work on people's convictions, that this practice does not do what they think it does," says Germaine Haddad, program officer at the UNFPA Egypt office.

Changing deep-seated cultural customs and behaviors will be tough where pressure from society and family members to continue tradition is intense. Without being circumcised, many parents believe their daughter won’t be a good wife and, more importantly, a good person.

“[A girl] has to go through this because [if she doesn’t] she’s going to face more consequences,” says Diop, “because what is worse than being rejected by your community?”

Zero Tolerance!


Located Globally in Europe, U.K. & USA

U.S. Offices:
Ohio:  +1 (330) 366.6860
Iowa: +1 (515) 518.0190
U.K.:   +11 44 702 405 9420


Copyright 2017




Thursday, February 2, 2017

Policing Oneself Is As Important! This Is Not a Breast or Penile Flashers Convention

Policing Oneself Is As Important!
This Is Not a Breast or Penile Flashers Convention
By Nicholas Ashton, CEO/CIO, CommSmart Global Group

Knowing the rules of the road, streets and social strata are majorly important for ground guidelines.  It seems the higher up the ladder you go, the less you remember and believe you are removed from those basic stipulations. 

You Are Not!

It is a ‘THEM vs. Us’ world.  Corporately and especially in law enforcement.  

Remembering your beginnings is so important and in many cases a lost cause.

Management is special in their skill sets and why they can manage and lead.

Once you have been promoted to a position of leadership and trust, remember it!

Just because you got the key to the executive bathroom, so to speak, don’t shut the door on those that have worked with you and assisted you through the years to attain this position.

In this anti-social world, it is easier to voice your opinions hidden behind a computer screen, Smartphone or Tablet.

Stop It!

Be open about your concerns and voice your thoughts and concerns in person.  

Collectively you do make a difference.

Recent events in the policing world of an Assistant Chief Constable, in annoyance, at a party retaliated to comments from a fellow employee, a woman officer.  This is about a senior policewoman who was 'flashed at by her female boss in a row over fake breasts'.  A totally vile way of showing her disdain, let alone her body as an action of displeasure.

Greater Manchester Assistant Chief Constable Rebekah Sutcliffe was suspended in May 2016 after she allegedly 'flashed' Superintendent Sarah Jackson.

Sutcliffe has escaped the sack after she launched a drunken tirade at a junior colleague about the size of her breasts!

A disciplinary panel ruled she should receive a final written warning instead. The officers publicly apologized for her behavior and say she'll ensure it never happens again. Sarah Rogers was at the hearing.

WHAT!

If this had been a ‘penile flashing, size matters’ event, the flasher would be terminated immediately!

So what was the disciplinary board, Chief Constable, and PCC thinking?

Rebekah Sutcliffe has lost her ability to lead, manage and be an example to the people who she is supposed to ‘protect & serve’. 

How can she ever discipline a co-worker with this stain on her character?

This is an example to the corporate and law enforcement world of the ‘THEM & Us’ concerns of today!

As a company who serves law enforcement globally and extremely successfully, it would be remiss of us if we did air our views on such an event.  It is not our desire to deal with those type of people, both the flasher and those involved with the disciplinary outcome.

We are for Sir Robert Peels’ Principles, the Policeman’s Bible and I do not see this being one of them!

We are here to be proactive in Digital Policing, not failed leadership on all fronts!

CommSmart Global Group
Virtual Crime Center
Office telephone #’s
USA:  +1 (330) 366.6860
          +1 (515) 257-8310
UK:    +44  72 405 9420
Twitter: “posiqr”

 copyright 2017



Thursday, January 26, 2017

Statistical Data/Information Screws You Over Every Time!

Statistical Data/Information
Screws You Over Every Time!
by Nicholas Ashton, CEO/CIO,
CommSmart Global Group, a LexisNexis Risk Solutions Partner

Reports on crime and how over the last decade trends have changed, with nothing happening that is changing the landscape of American’s slide in societal deprivation is a crime in itself.

Then we see this released report:

“While national crime statistics remain historically low, violent crime—particularly homicides and shootings—is rising in many major cities. The Police Foundation and the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA), with generous support from the Joyce Foundation, are jointly releasing a report entitled, Reducing Violent Crime in American Cities: An Opportunity to Lead. The report provides more than 25 recommendations for the new Administration and Congress, to strengthen federal-local partnerships and support local efforts to reduce violent crime.”

Sorry, it just does not paint the real picture whatsoever!

They do nothing for the street level crime fighting of NOW!

Why would I severely knock such a report? 

It is totally out of date and out of true facts for today with a major safety factor staring you right in the face! 

For crying out loud it is 2017 and this report does not even contain the reprehensible shootings and murder information on Chicago or other increases in crime nationwide!

Let us continue:

“According to FBI data, the country’s largest cities experienced a 10% increase in homicide and non-negligent murder from 2014 to 2015, and the second largest group of cities saw a 20% surge. More recent data from MCCA suggest these surges in large cities remains steady, with 61 agencies reporting a 10% increase in homicide from 2015 to 2016, and 1400 additional non-fatal shootings over 2015, another important indicator of violent crime. Law enforcement agencies in many of these cities are also reporting substantial increases in non-fatal shootings, another important indicator of violent crime. While the federal government has provided important assistance in recent years, budget and personnel reductions coupled with competing for federal priorities leave some local law enforcement agencies without the fortified partnerships they need to effectively combat violent crime. Law enforcement leaders call for a federal agenda that prioritizes violent crime from both a budgetary and policy standpoint, and that addresses problems with evidence-based solutions.”

As a passionate company that has the world’s largest repository of data/information at our fingers, you can see why we are concerned that law enforcement is working with limited out of date information which places officers and the community at risk.

Meld this with your local crime data, street smart experience, and CommSmart Global Group, a LexisNexis Risk Solutions Partner you have more logical, usable information to be proactive way beyond your previous capabilities.

Those concerned about how we can have extraordinary vetting of those wishing to come to America, have no fear, already in place is the social apparatus to do just that.  The structure for knowing who is who is available and knows more of what is in the face and words of a form can be governmentally implemented expeditiously.

Stop having meeting after meeting whilst crime permeates into the underlying skin of your community spreading a ‘Fear Factor’. 

Our logical down to earth conversational team of ex-law enforcement personnel & analysts, who have a successful approach to proven solutions from social media scraping to successful predictive analytics is right here and will coach and mentor with technology resolutions, yes, working side by side to understand your local community issues.

For 21 years or crime, analytics have been assisting over 800 agencies globally and includes work for the D.o.D. (Department of Defense, USA) saving lives in predicting the locations of roadside IEDs. A Major life-saving technique that has a massive opportunity in local law enforcement.

If we only have it 50% right in what we state and will achieve, then Chicago murders and shootings would be half of what they are and in the continuance of affecting local communities who live in fear for 1,600 + gang members who are the core issue that must be eradicated.

You are failing to fight the battle of the streets, CommSmart Global Group does not!
  • Informative community crime mapping (See USA Crime 'live' Now)
  • Crime Analytics with officer dashboard current data
  • Predictive Analytics
  • Social Media Scraping (Monitoring)
  • Real Time Coaching & Mentoring

It is Your Call!


Contact Us:
Located Globally in Europe, U.K. & USA
A LexisNexis Risk Solutions Partner

Phone:
Ohio:  +1 (330) 366.6860
Iowa: +1 (515) 518-0190

Twitter: “posiqr”

LinkedIn:




Copyright 2017

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Why Lawlessness Is Rampant From Chicago and We Can & Will Resolve It! Let Us In Rham!

History Is Peeling Back The Answers…
Why Lawlessness Is Rampant From Chicago 
To Port Of Spain, Bahrain to Baltimore & Columbus to San Antonio.
By Nicholas Ashton,  CEO/CIO, CommSmart Global Group

President Donald Trump is as concerned with the state of Chicago streets as any sane person would be.  Except for maybe Rham Emmanuel, Mayor of Chicago!

Trumps says he will send the Feds if Chicago doesn't fix the horrible carnage that is going on. News Report

Trump has previously encouraged Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel to ask for federal assistance. Emanuel has not addressed Trump's tweet or spoken about the violence as it relates to possible federal intervention.

Mayor Emanuel has specified areas he'd like the federal government's help -- including gun control, gun tracking, prosecution for gun crimes and help increase funding for more police officers.

Government relies on statistical information collection which by the time the report comes out, it is too late!  Information and data is demanded now and that is why CommSmart Global Group, a LexisNexis Risk Solutins Partner, has approached from a totally different direction!

WE ARE IN THE NOW AND KEEP YOU; IN THE KNOW...

No single person knows all the answers!  It is the collective information from yesterday, today and tomorrow that paves the way forward for a safe and harmonious society.

Firstly, let us look back in history, in 1829, Sir Robert Peel created the Metropolitan Police when he served as Home Secretary of England. According to Peel, the real key for policing is "the police are the people and the people are the police".

Peel believed that prevention of crime could be accomplished without intruding into the lives of citizens. With the development of the Metropolitan Police, Peel established nine principles to his theory of policing. These nine principles are as relevant today, if not more important with the events worldwide, as they were in the 1800's.

Community policing is based on Peel's concept of prevention. Community policing has been embraced by many law enforcement organizations across the world and in most cases, it has been forgotten from whence it came.
Community policing is based on its goal to prevent crime and promote better police-community partnerships.

Community policing requires an investment in training with special attention to problem analysis and problem-solving, facilitation, community organization; communication, mediation, and conflict resolution, resource identification and use, networking and linkages, and cross-cultural competency.

Let us look at what the Peelian Principles stated:

  1. The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder.
  2. The ability of the police (public safety) to perform their duties is dependent upon the public approval of police actions.
  3. Police must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observation of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public.
  4. The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force.
  5. Police seek and preserve public favor not by catering to a public or political opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.
  6. Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and the warning is found to be insufficient.
  7. Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public is the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
  8. Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions, and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary.
  9. The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.
Now the Honesty Test, how many of those nine principles are you abiding with?  Do not excuse your answer by saying “times have changed” that is not acceptable!

Disgusting isn’t it!  Not one of you got the majority of the questions correct and you expect the public to trust you?

Whether this is a corporation or a public safety department, the principles are the same and must be adhered to.  For us, all to get back to doing the job we accepted in the first place is understanding the realms of law enforcement from top to bottom.  Yes, the commissioner on down needs to uphold the laws and the principles set forth.  There is no wiggle room for lawlessness, corruption, and conspiracy in the duty of a peacekeeping officer, no matter what rank has been bestowed on them.  We are all servants to the cause of upholding the law!

Let remind ourselves, in an overview of Sir Robert Peel’s understandings:

Prevention

Sir Robert Peel's first principle was that the "basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder". Peel established the police, also known as "Bobbies".

The introduction of "beats" was performed by Bobbies as a form of patrolling. Our law enforcement agencies still have police patrolling the streets with the goal of preventing crime. CommSmart US, like others, have called for the use of "Broken Windows principle with a previous article "Broken Windows, No, Not Broken Windows", (http://tip2tap.blogspot.com/2013/03/broken-windows-broken-lives-both-will.html) an article that called for a "return to the nineteenth-century style of policing in which police maintained a presence in the community by walking beats, getting to know citizens, and establishing the feeling of public safety and trust. Others asked Police administrators to get their officers out of depersonalized patrol cars and play an active role in the community by identifying the neighborhoods' problems and needs and set a course of action for an effective response.

Public Approval

Public approval and cooperation are the basis of Sir Robert Peel's next five principles of effective policing. Peel stated that the ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police actions and they must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observance of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public. In our diverse society, it is necessary for police to understand the different cultures that make up the communities that they patrol.

This can be accomplished through multicultural training and education.  It is formal training that today can allow us to understand the drug/gang cultures that have broken communities and left a trail of despair and mistrust with the citizens. 

If police can relate to and understand the different cultures of the community, they will be able to successfully gain public approval. Public approval of the police will increase the effectiveness of law enforcement.

The next two principles deal with force. Peel stated "the degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force and that police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice, and warning is found to be insufficient."

We wonder why citizens are concerned when the police turn up with military equipment and look more like an army that a local policeman.  The criminals are using more sophisticated techniques and technology and we do have to fight fire with fire, albeit that the community has never been informed why. 

We think they already know what the issues and solutions are, they do not!
This is very relative to our society when full force is used by law enforcement.
Excessive force has been a public concern and the first sign of community mistrust in the police.

It can take years to gain the trust of a community and one incident to lose that trust. It is necessary for the police to have the cooperation of the public in order to function effectively. By providing adequate training on the use of force and having the public's trust and respect can ensure that force is only used to the extent necessary.

When individuals have little or no respect towards the police, they are most likely to ignore the requests or demands of officers. This can lead to the officer having to use force in order to gain control of a situation. When police are faced with dispersing large crowds, it is necessary for the public to have the respect to follow police orders. When individuals lack trust and respect for the police, riots may occur, which can also lead to arrests, serious injuries, and even death.

Concerns are being shown by public safety as there is a campaign to place law enforcement in a bad light.  The instigator's egg on police officers for reaction whilst videotaping and then placing it on YouTube for all to see.  The video is being used as a weapon of mistrust and does not always tell the real story.

Community Policing


Sir Robert Peel's principles and Community Policing go hand in hand and share the same concepts and goals in policing. One of the distinct similarities between Peel's approach and Community Policing is that prevention of crimes is the number one priority. Community Policing has many underlying principles. It bases the theory that crime prevention is the responsibility of the total community and that police and the community share ownership, responsibility, and accountability for the prevention of crime.

When police work with the community and focus on their concerns relating to crime, they form an effective relationship when dealing with crime. It is necessary for the police to respect all different types of cultures that make up the community in order to gain the respect from those individuals that make up the neighborhoods they are working in.

Mutual trust between the police and the community is essential for effective policing. Community policing requires a large investment in training with special attention to problem analysis and problem-solving, facilitation, community organization; communication, mediation, and conflict resolution, resource identification and use, networking and linkages, and cross-cultural competency.

It is about intelligence gather at street level, ComSmart US's Atmospheric Noise Gathering or Chatter on the Streets is key in its ability to have information that is analyzed immediately and not placed in data silos.  Along with Social Media Intelligence Gathering (SMIG), we then have full access to real concerns of the streets and places us in a far better position to act with authority.

Mistakes in Community Policing

In order to learn from the past, we must examine the mistakes made in community policing and correct them in the future. In some cases, lack of planning has been found to be a mistake in instituting community policing.

In many cases, programs are more determined by the availability of grant funding and the need to appease certain neighborhood groups. Appeasement is the worst excuse for a solution and needs to be stopped immediately!  Providing this community policing programs without an effective plan of strategy or establishing them just to appease a certain group will never be effective due to lack of commitment and interest by the police.

Another mistake often made is when budgets are cut by politicians who have no earthly idea about policing whatsoever; the community policing programs are the first to go. Even though it is necessary to make cuts, if a program has proven to be effective, it could be more cost effective to keep it.

Communicating with our Diverse Population

CommSmart Global Group's coaching and mentoring provide the police officers, communicating skills with diverse populations and groups are among the fundamentals of community and problem oriented policing. The explanation of the importance of effective communication requires a shared base of experience and a common set of rules about the meaning of not just words, but how you sound when you say something, the order of your words, volume, pauses, facial expressions, and gestures. 

This is also caused by not knowing or understanding other people's cultures and can, in turn, lead to distrust, loss of credibility, and an inability to work together effectively. Some of the tips for effective communication given in the training included eye contact, which can be determined in different ways based on different cultures. In the United States, it is considered to be rude when you do not give eye contact, but in other cultures such as Latin and Asian, averting your eyes is a sign of respect.

Another form of communication looked at was the use of facial expressions and gestures. Many expressions and gestures have different meanings among the diverse cultures in our society. Many cases of miscommunication are a result of not understanding what the other person meant. With proper training and the effectiveness to communicate, law enforcement will be able to achieve their goals.

Even the Metropolitan Police Section 66 (Stop, Search and Detain) is and was very useful as is New York’s Stop and Frisk policy or was we know SIP, (Stop, Interview, Process.  A police officer must know who is in his beat area and community!

In Conclusion

Since Sir Robert Peel introduced his nine principles of policing in the early 1800's, for the most part, our world has continued to follow his ideas of effective policing.

Community policing has been the main focus in policing. Law enforcement has had many challenges throughout the years, including the increase of cultural diversity among our communities. Sir Robert Peel established that police and the people of the community are equal in terms of effective policing. It is extremely necessary to have effective communication between the two in order for any concept to be successful.

CommSmart Global group, a LexisNexis Risk Solutions Partner is a private company that has time proven experts in all fields, atmospherics, major crime, drug enforcement, contraband, counterfeiting, gang/insurgency understanding/solutions, cultural diversity, corruption, analytics and next event predictability within its vast tool box.
 
When working with a country or an agency, CommSmart Global Group is the conduit for solutions and resolutions which the citizens demand.  It is our expertise working alongside the force and imparting our vast knowledge that once the solution is in place, the police continue with the plans that are working and succeeding.

  • A tool to increase law enforcement’s odds of stopping crime
  • A predictor of where and when a type of crime is most likely to occur
  • A technology for any jurisdiction of any size
  • A way to bring newer officers up to speed faster
  • Easily accessible and available immediately where and when it is needed

All available and working in the prevention of crime...

WE are in the NOW and
KEEP YOU; in the KNOW…

WWW.COMMSMARTGLOBALGROUP.COM

Worldwide Call: +1 (330) 366.6860


Copyright 2017